In
This Issue
Feature
Putting
the “Relational” Back in Human Relationships
by
Diana McLain Smith
No
systems thinker worthy of the name would argue that a single
cause, close in time and space, produces a single result in
any complex system. Yet that kind of linear thinking governs
how most of us think about relationships and the troubles they
sometimes encounter. When upset, even the best systems thinker
among us automatically reasons: When you did “that,”
it made me feel “this.”
As Peter Senge points out in The Fifth Discipline,
the roots of this straight-line thinking go back millennia,
and changing it won’t be easy.
The
“Anatomy
Framework”
introduced in this article helps people understand the complex
patterns of interaction that lead upsetting events to recur.
These patterns, once they take shape and take hold, define how
a relationship works—the underlying anatomy or structure
of a relationship. Within that structure, people’s interlocking
actions and reactions create a particular pattern, while their
respective social contexts and experiential knowledge lock that
pattern into place. Using a relational way of thinking opens
up numerous options for changing these dynamics. People who
take a relational perspective build relationships that grow
stronger over time, while those who think in more simplistic,
either/or terms build relationships that grow more fragile.
Systems
Stories
Pea Beans in Ethiopia: Challenges of Creating New Business
Models for Sustainable Livelihoods
by Don Seville
Understanding complex market dynamics is as important
to farmers in rural Ethiopia as it is to leaders of global corporations.
The New Business Models for Sustainable Trading Relationships
Project is helping build good business practices in the Ethiopian
communities that grow, buy, process, and export white pea beans.
The goal is to move from short-term thinking where either the
farmers maximize price (leading to overshoot and collapse of
the market) or the exporters minimize price (leaving the farmer
with no profit to invest in farm, family, and community) to
developing business models that link the longer-term goals and
knowledge of the exporters and farmers. Ultimately, project
leaders hope to create a more stable and profitable market for
all involved and build the base for sustainable livelihoods
in rural Ethiopia.
Viewpoint
Continuous Partial Attention and the Demise of Discretionary
Time
by Peter W. Pruyn
In 1998, Linda Stone, a former Apple and Microsoft
executive, coined a phrase that gives a name to the crux of
our technology-enabled addiction to information: “continuous
partial attention.” Through the miniaturization and proliferation
of wireless technologies, we now have the ability to multitask
like never before, with our cell phones, Blackberries, email,
internet access, iPods, and the like. But with the world continually
at our fingertips, have we lost the ability to truly connect
with others or to achieve the level of focus required for our
greatest creativity to emerge? This may be the single most important
issue of our time, because it affects how well we go about solving
all problems—if we even recognize them at all.
|
|
The powerful, practical e-newsletter that helps you act with
the confidence that comes with systems understanding.











Pegasus
Home
|